Some time ago I had blogged about my magazine problem here. Well, this past week, Cosmo has seen it fit to provide me with, not one, but two complimentary copies of their magazine - one of the regular US Cosmo and another of the Latina edition.
Now, I don't know if it is my bias or not, but my jaw just dropped when I saw this article below.
Now I read a lot of magazines and I have not, in the last 5 years, seen any magazine not say to substitute brown rice wherever white rice is mentioned, except this one. And they are saying white rice is good for you because of the manganese content (which brown rice also has). And potatoes? "High in vitamin C, potatoes can boost immunity to cold-causing bugs."
This is an obvious endorsement of foods without the usual qualifiers (in moderation, better with X substitution, etc.). In fact, I don't think I've ever seen any item in this list promoted as being "good for you" except maybe coffee in some instances.
Hmmmm I am not sure what to make of this at all, but whatever it is, it just does not feel right. What say you?
Now, I don't know if it is my bias or not, but my jaw just dropped when I saw this article below.
Now I read a lot of magazines and I have not, in the last 5 years, seen any magazine not say to substitute brown rice wherever white rice is mentioned, except this one. And they are saying white rice is good for you because of the manganese content (which brown rice also has). And potatoes? "High in vitamin C, potatoes can boost immunity to cold-causing bugs."
This is an obvious endorsement of foods without the usual qualifiers (in moderation, better with X substitution, etc.). In fact, I don't think I've ever seen any item in this list promoted as being "good for you" except maybe coffee in some instances.
Hmmmm I am not sure what to make of this at all, but whatever it is, it just does not feel right. What say you?
Comments